Multiple developers are referring to and on the production quality of the coins did not give any kind of results, and this is a natural result - pools began to give up the coins. The first was - HASH-TO-COINS, a waiting list of 2 pools. Tentative trading www.cryptopia.co.nz of the low (or rather zero) turnover. If in the near future the situation will not change it can lead to a complete abandonment of the coin. Here I would like to once again appeal to the administration and developers so that they have revised their policies on coin production. I certainly understand there podobonoe protection - 90% of production is rejected by the system - that's for sure busting !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We've had numerous discussions about this over the years since the 51% defense system was implemented. The confusion seems to arise because Goldcoin is uniquely equipped to thwart auto-switching multi-pools.
The code is engineered to reward loyal miners and to reject unfriendly pools that maliciously strip-mine coins leaving them for dead once the difficulty rises and the coin becomes unprofitable to mine. Expecting a coin that was designed to be incompatible with multi-pools to work well with multi-pools is unreasonable and illogical.
I would remind you that Goldcoin is open source, consensus based, optional to mine, and experimental. If you have a specific idea for improving Goldcoin, you should clearly articulate it. If you have specific code changes that you would like to see implemented, you should submit them for the developers and community to review.
But so far, all I've seen is your complaint about a coin reliably performing in a manner consistent with its design.